Search This Blog

Thursday 26 September 2013

Tears As Nigerian Army Buries 14 Soilders Killed By Boko Haram

ears flew freely at the Military burial ground, Abuja, on Thursday, when the remains of two officers and 13 soldiers who paid the supreme price in the ongoing prosecution of the state of emergency in the Northern-eastern part of the country and the United Nations Peace Keeping Mission in Dafur, Sudan, were laid to rest.
Families and friends of the deceased, including those present, could not hold back tears as the fallen heroes were given full military and national honour for their sacrifices to ensure that peace reigns in Nigeria and the African Region.
The two officers are; Major A.T. Fambiya and Major Abdullahi Kanoma while the soldiers include; SSGT Keku Adebayo, CPL Ahmed Usman, CPL Mathew Ade, LCPL Adamu Ibrahim, LCPL Suleiman Gimba, LCPL Salisu Sadauki, LBDR Usman David, LCPL Ajani Olosola, PTE Zakariya Dauda, PTE Daniel Kantoma, PTE Nya Bassey, PTE Bassey Emmanuel, and PTE Enyenihi Effiong.


President Goodluck Jonathan, who recalled the need to declare a state of emergency in the three states of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa to tackle the Boko Haram insurgency, urged the families of the deceased to take solace in the fact that the country was winning the war against insurgents and terrorists.
“Indeed, for us all, the loss is taste of regret but we take solace in the fact that we are winning the war, they shall rest in peace knowing that, as members of the Armed Forces, you must know that the military profession is a hazardous job and in conflicts like this, there are bound to be casualty, including death. Rather than despair and lose focus of our objective, it is incumbent on us to respect and honour the dead by giving them a befitting burial while we keep strategising to defeat the enemy.
“On several occasions and in different fora, I have reiterated the commitment of this administration to strengthening and improving on the nation’s security capability to enable us to confront challenges of the 21st century. As a result, this administration has steadfastedly evolved and implemented policies and measures to tackle the country’s current developmental challenges, especially, the Boko Haram terrorist insurgency.
“Accordingly and in order to face the threat headlong, I declared emergency in three northern states of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa on May 14, 2013, thus the Chief of Defence Staff was mandated to deploy troops in these states to take all necessary actions within the ambit of their rule of engagement to end the impunity of insurgents and terrorists. Today, we are here to lay to rest two officers and 13 soldiers who gallantly paid the supreme price as a result of this declaration. I want to reiterate that their sacrifices shall not and will never be in vain,” the President represented by Vice President, Namadi Sambo, stated.
He assured the families of the deceased that the nation would not forget the sacrifices of their loved ones, promising that their entitlements would be duly paid.
“To the families of the deceased, gallant officers and soldiers, I want to assure you that our country will not forget you in this trying time. I have conferred with the Chief of Defence Staff, COAS, and I want to also assure you that all settlements due +to you shall be promptly settled. All other welfare issues shall also be duly taken care of, remember that your loss is also the nation’s loss, be comforted that your departed ones are resting in the bosom of the Lord, may the Almighty grant you the fortitude to bear the loss,” President Jonathan told the families of the departed.
Minister for State for Defence, Olusola Obada, also commended the selflessness with which the departed officers and soldiers carried out their duties.
“Their death, though in line of duty, was a gallant sacrifice for peace to reign in our dear nation. Members of the Armed Forces and the Nigeria nation will not forget the gallant efforts of these great men who proudly showcased the great spirit and tenacity required to save our nation from destructive elements.
“We must, therefore, see their death as a call to duty to serve humanity and not to let the sacrifices be in vain as we continue to confront the present challenges, we must emulate the selflessness, courage and commitment exhibited by these men.
“At times like this, words of comfort will be difficult to console or completely heal your losses, my appeal to you is to take solace in God who is the greatest comforter. We will stand by you to mitigate whatever hardship their death will bring,” the minister said.
Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant General Ihejirika, who explained that many of the fallen heroes died in the North-east, also noted that for paying the supreme sacrifice, ‘these courageous officers and soldiers have made all of us proud as Nigerians.”

“As we all know, the military profession is a hazardous one and in any armed conflict, casualties are bound to occur, some of which may result in the supreme sacrifice. Therefore, when it occured, it was incumbent upon us all to honour and accord our departed colleagues the highest and last solemn respect.
“Today, we are laying to rest 15 heroes, comprising two officers and 13 soldiers who paid supreme in the service of our dear nation. Many of these heroes lost their lives in the North-east, three lost their lives in operation in other parts of the North and one died while serving on peace keeping mission with the United Nations Mission in Dafur, Sudan,” he stated.
“They were outstanding throughout their careers with much sense of responsibility, doggedness and commitment to duty and global peace. Let me say that for paying the supreme sacrifice, these courageous officers and soldiers have made all of us proud as Nigerians. Undeniably, the gallantry and high sense of functionality displayed by these gentlemen have contributed to the restoration of peace and normalcy to most parts of Northern Nigeria, particularly, the North-eastern part.

“It is, therefore, our resolve that the labour of these fallen heroes shall never be in vain. We will remain spurred by their zeal and gallant efforts to ensure that terrorism and insurgency are defeated so that our country can enjoy the much desired peace and progress,” the COAS stressed.
To families, he said;
 “For the families of the departed colleagues here, along with those whose wards have been buried earlier in accordance with Muslim rites, I know that no amount of compensation can replace the lives of these gallant heroes, we share with you all this moment of grief and we will do everything possible to assuage the sense of loss.
“Let me assure you that the Nigerian Army will ensure the next of kin of these deceased get all their deserved benefits and timely too. It is said that every soul shall taste death, these officers and soldiers have bound to mother earth, certainly, this is monumental loss to their families, the Nigerian Army and Armed Forces and other security agencies and our dear country, Nigeria. We take solace in the fact that they lost their lives in order that Nigerians and Nigeria will continue to enjoy peace and freedom.”
Earlier, the Chief of Defence Staff, Admiral Ola Ibrahim, warned those who were bent on destabilising the country to beware of the Armed Forces readiness to ensure the peace and protection of the nation’s territorial integrity at all cost.
“While we take solace in the fact that their death will not be in vain, what we are doing here today is a warning signal to those terrorists and all persons seeking to destabilise and undermine the corporate existence and territorial integrity of Nigeria that Nigeria, especially our Armed Forces, are willing and capable of safeguiding the nation, even at the cost of their lives.
“To the families of our departed officers and soldiers, members of the Armed Forces and the entire nation share in your loss and grief. Be rest assured that the nation appreciates the great sacrifices of your loved ones. Their colleagues have assured us that they will ensure that their deaths are not in vain and they will continue with vigour to solve the problem at hand, especially the one that led to the loss of these gallant officers and soldiers.” he said.
Pastor Aliyu Joshua, who spoke on behalf of the bereaved families, thanked the Armed Forces for the honour accorded their loved ones but also called for investigations into the remote causes of the death.

Tuesday 24 September 2013

BIRTHDAY TRAGEDY: Girl raped, fiance shot

Tragedy struck at the university town of Nsukka, EnuguState, weekend, as unidentified gunmen raped a young girl, who was celebrating her birthday with her lover boy, who was also shot in the head.
Vanguard gathered that the incident occurred last Saturday, when the girl’s boyfriend, identified as Sunday Ozioko, 30, took out his lover in his new Toyota Camry saloon car as part of the birthday celebration.
It was learned that the gunmen, who rode in a motorcycle, blocked the vehicle along Orba Road at 6.30p.m., took over the car and sped off through Orba Market to Obollo-Afor.
They stopped at Alor-Ano Community Secondary School, raped the girl and shot her fiancé, who survived the attack, but was said to be in critical condition.
A source told Vanguard that when the two gunmen were through at 9:30p.m., they gave the victim N500, having been dropped off at Odolu in Kogi State.
Realising that the girl could identify then later, the bandits allegedly made for the girl again, who was able to escape through a path that led her to a crusade ground, where Adonai Faith Assembly was having a vigil.
Rescue
The obviously horrified girl was said to have narrated her ordeal to the congregation, who she told her fiancee was still lying in his pool of blood.
According to a source, the pastor of the church immediately swung into action, reached out to the police at Nsukka Urban, who quickly rushed him to Bishop Shanahan Hospital, Nsukka.
Efforts made to speak with the victim at his hospital private ward proved abortive as his relations barred press men from seeing him.
Sunday Ozioko has, however, been transferred to UNTH, Enugu, for a surgical operation on his head.
Enugu State Police spokesman, Ebere Amarizu, said police were on top of the situation and vowed that everything would be done to track down the bandits

Jonathan’s lamentation on corruption

administration’s seemingly tolerant disposition towards corruption, President Goodluck Jonathan recently tried to turn the tables against Nigerians, blaming them for the failure of the anti-graft war. Launching his offensive at the 54th Annual Conference of the Nigerian Economic Society in Abuja last week, the President said that corruption had continued to thrive in the country mainly because his fellow citizens tended to “reward corrupt practices.”
From the President’s perspective, Nigerians had lost touch with their traditional values of honesty and hard work, which used to be the foundation for wealth acquisition. “(If) a young man who just started a job and, within six months or a year, comes up with a car of N7 million to N15 million and you clap for him, then you are rewarding corruption,” he argued, as he tried to persuade Nigerians to share his views. There is no doubt that the President was spot-on in his observations, but dead wrong in reinforcing the blame culture.
Certainly, the orgy of recklessness and greed in the country is quite troubling. Nigerians now worship money and the society no longer asks questions regarding a person’s source of wealth. Even in glaring cases of public office holders corruptly enriching themselves, once they manage to escape into the warm embrace of their kith and kin, they can be sure of maximum support and protection. A very good example of this was the case of a former governor of Delta State, James Ibori, whose arrest by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission officials was stoutly resisted by gun-totting young men at Oghara, his home town, shortly before his escape from the country and eventual arrest abroad.
Not willing to be outdone by the youths, elderly women also came out, bare-chested, to protest the alleged witch-hunt of their son. The same “innocent” son of Oghara is now serving a 13-year prison term in the United Kingdom over the same corrupt offences for which his people attempted to shield him from arrest.
The same thing also happened when a senior civil servant, Abdulrasheed Maina, who was accused of misappropriating public pension funds, was asked to come and explain his role at the Senate. Not only did he refuse to appear before the lawmakers, group after group came out to stage protests, warning the security agencies against laying a finger on the suspect. Also following in the same pattern, a former governor of Bayelsa State, Diepriye Alamieyeseigha, who jumped bail after his arrest in the United Kingdom for alleged money laundering and returned to Nigeria, allegedly dressed like a woman, was warmly celebrated at home for his great escape. These reflect the extent to which Nigerians are willing to go to “reward corrupt practices.”
But corruption has brought about untold hardship to many Nigerians and is believed to be responsible for the country’s underdevelopment. The chair of Transparency International, the global civil society organisation that fights corruption, Higuette Labelle, says “corruption remains an enormous drain on resources.” In many cases, resources allocated to education, health, transport, sports and other critical areas are misapplied or stolen outright, leading to a fall in the general quality of life. Corruption in Nigeria is described by Global Campaign Against Corruption, a rights group, as “a wall-to-wall phenomenon, blanketing and smouldering every aspect of the country’s socio-economic life.” It is believed that over $400 billion of the country’s resources have been lost to corruption in the past 40 years. The President’s statement, therefore, sounds so appealing to a public seething at the arrogant flaunting of ill-gotten wealth.
Having made his point, however, it would be wrong for Jonathan to think that Nigerians are satisfied with that simplistic explanation for the pervasive nature of corruption in the country. It would amount to passing the buck for the President to come up with such an excuse and think he would be applauded. If his observation is that Nigerians are wallowing in corruption, what has he done about it? Why is he the President?
The President’s stinging remarks provide a sobering insight into his leadership style. For leadership to be credible, a report, The Fight Against Corruption: A World Bank Perspective, says, it must transcend mere pronouncements or ethical exhortations to combat the evils of corruption. It needs to be backed by concrete, monitorable and time-bound actions, to which the country’s leadership is held accountable.
For a leader that desires the best for his people, what is required of Jonathan now is not lamentation, but to reposition anti-graft agencies in the country to rein in the scourge. What Nigerians need to fall in line is a conviction that the leadership is not accommodating towards corruption. Jonathan can set this example by publicly declaring his assets. He should also ensure that those accused of corrupt practices are not only put on trial, but that their trial is expeditiously done. Curiously, close to two years after the fuel subsidy scam came to light, nobody has been conclusively tried and punished. It is actions such as this that encourage corruption. But, in the fight against corruption, leadership has to be by example, not by precept.

ASUU Strike: Why FG Released Only N30bn — Suswam

The federal government has explained why it released only N30 billion rather that the N92 billion demanded by the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) as part of the ‘earned allowance.’


enue State governor Gabriel Suswam, who heads the FG’s Needs Assessment Committee, while speaking yesterday in Abuja during a meeting with the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) said the government had to verify that the earned allowance being requested by ASUU is up to N92 billion.
Suswam also said the N30 billion was yesterday released to the Ministry of Education for immediate distribution to the university councils.
He said only the university councils could carry out such verification, noting that government cannot hand out money without verification.
He noted that government would release more money if after due process had been followed a deficit was noted.
He said, “On the issue of earned allowance, the government has accepted in principle the payment of earned allowance which ASUU valued at N92billion. What the FG has done is to release an initial sum of N30billion and we appealed to ASUU to go and verify exactly how much each person is owed so we would know how the figure of N92 billion was arrived at.”
Suswam disclosed that government had already released the N30billion in question the previous day to the Ministry of Education which would in turn release it to governing councils of the institutions and was then appealing to the lecturers to return to work.
“We have appealed to ASUU to take this initial sum and verify how much each person is being owed. If at the end of the day, we find out that we underpaid, we make up for the deficit but ASUU has refused this strategy, insisting that the entire lump sum of N92billion be paid to them upfront,” he said.
The governor also said the striking members of the ASUU have been unfair to Nigerian students even after government has taken great strides to meet their demands.
Also speaking, NANS president-, Yinka Gbadebo said the students decided to pay a visit to the governor so as to hear the government’s side of the story.
He said the students had earlier met with the leadership of ASUU, the minister of education and the executive secretary of NUC.
“We are here to hear your own side of the story because since the beginning of the strike, there has been so much pressure on us to go into the streets to protest but we don’t believe protest should be the first port of call. All we are told is that we the Nigerian students need to protest in order to coerce the government into meeting the demands of ASUU but we want to know firsthand what the government has done to ensure the reopening of our universities as soon as possible,” he said.
LEADERSHIP
Short URL: http://www.osundefender.org/?p=119567
Posted by on Sep 4 2013. Filed under AFRICA, ANNOUNCEMENT, ENTERTAINMENT, FEATURE, FOR THE RECORDS, From The Press, Front Page Story, INTERVIEW, NEWS, News Across Nigeria. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

13 Comments for “ASUU Strike: Why FG Released Only N30bn — Suswam”

  1. nice
    I don’t knw d purpose of dis useless asuu, y are dey doing dis to we student,FG hav done dere part, y can’t dey reconcile and call off d strike den go back to table for renegotiate.everybody knw dey re fighting for dere own interest nt we student. Am very sure dat if FG release d 92billion for dem today, asuu will call off d strike. foolish asuu
    • Anonymous
      Am surprise at ur comment so if u are d lecturer and u are owe ten naira and u protested and ur employ give u two naira u wil collect and thank God abi? Frm ur comment it has shown d kind of undergraduate u are make sound comment and dont show ur ignorant in public i pity ur parent who are wasting money on u in sch
    • Frm Marcus Y s irt dat asuu a very very stupid n not calnoff d strik for studnt to return bk to scu?
      Y s asuu so so stupid n caln of d strik?
    • Anonymous
      asuu useless? you call your teachers useless? what then can you benefit from useless people? maybe the strike is called off today and you are made to pay 10k for each chapter of yr project before approval, pay for yr teachers to come to class if the class size is more than 70 people and also pay for yr marks, consumables for research,and forced to bring your generators to class then you will understand how useless asuu can be!
  2. Anonymous
    pls my frnd, mind ur comment. stop using abusive language on any of the party rather pray God’s intervention.
    • Anonymous
      Leave God out of dis tell FG if u care to give d complete money moreover non of d executive members are being owe a dime or if are they saying they are not owing d lecturers?
  3. nice
    @ anonymous,I can c u don’t hav sense at all, hv already knew d kind of person u re, dis is nt my first time of reading ur comment, all ur comment concerning d protest shows dat u always follow wateva people say, so I can’t blame u, if u listen to news I believe dat ur locked brain will open.u will knw wat asuu is fighting for.maybe ur father is among those thieves lecturer. Idiot
  4. ade
    Anonymous, y re u criticising student like u, instead of u to support him, if u listen to news yesterday,u will know wat dis guy is saying is d truth. Suswam said dey FG can’t just released d money for dem without a verification by the university council which is d truth.if u hav a company and ur workers just demand for some allowances without verification, will u give dem?
  5. ade
    Anonymous, y re u criticising a student like u, instead of u to support him, if u listen to news yesterday,u will know wat dis guy is saying is d truth. Suswam said dey FG can’t just released d money for dem without a verification by the university council which is d truth.if u hav a company and ur workers just demand for some allowances without verification, will u give dem?
    • Anonymous
      ade. sorry you have to believe a man who has been collecting salary for the past six months and his primary school teachers are on strike for more than six months this concluded academic year. same thing happened two sessions ago in his state. back to the bone of contention. three yrs ago cbn governor bailed three banks out with 400 billion without budgetary allocation and nobody said a thing. 92 billion covers excess workload and responsibility allowances. if you are sincere, how many lecturers have class size lass than 50 people to teach? what of marking of scripts? in some cases, a lecturer may be teaching more than two courses per semester and it is assumed that the class size is he unesco standard. haba! let govt not pay and keep establishing universities here and there and lets see how the economy will improve,
      supporting nice? his sentence construction is appalling for an undergraduate if he is one. lets build the educational sector with constructive criticism
  6. Jejelayegba
    I think the issue on ground is that of agreement so FG should honour it. If the President could spend a whole day in his party’s convention, can’t he meet with ASUU himself as a lecturer instead delegating such to people who do not know the value of education.
  7. […] The Ibadan Zone of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), on Wednesday, described the claim by the Federal Government that it has released a sum of N130 billion, to universities, as a fraud. RELATED POST: ASUU Strike: Why FG Released Only N30bn — Suswam […]

Leave a Reply






enue State governor Gabriel Suswam, who heads the FG’s Needs Assessment Committee, while speaking yesterday in Abuja during a meeting with the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) said the government had to verify that the earned allowance being requested by ASUU is up to N92 billion. Suswam also said the N30 billion was yesterday released to the Ministry of Education for immediate distribution to the university councils.
He said only the university councils could carry out such verification, noting that government cannot hand out money without verification.
He noted that government would release more money if after due process had been followed a deficit was noted.
He said, “On the issue of earned allowance, the government has accepted in principle the payment of earned allowance which ASUU valued at N92billion. What the FG has done is to release an initial sum of N30billion and we appealed to ASUU to go and verify exactly how much each person is owed so we would know how the figure of N92 billion was arrived at.”
Suswam disclosed that government had already released the N30billion in question the previous day to the Ministry of Education which would in turn release it to governing councils of the institutions and was then appealing to the lecturers to return to work.
“We have appealed to ASUU to take this initial sum and verify how much each person is being owed. If at the end of the day, we find out that we underpaid, we make up for the deficit but ASUU has refused this strategy, insisting that the entire lump sum of N92billion be paid to them upfront,” he said.
The governor also said the striking members of the ASUU have been unfair to Nigerian students even after government has taken great strides to meet their demands.
Also speaking, NANS president-, Yinka Gbadebo said the students decided to pay a visit to the governor so as to hear the government’s side of the story.
He said the students had earlier met with the leadership of ASUU, the minister of education and the executive secretary of NUC.
“We are here to hear your own side of the story because since the beginning of the strike, there has been so much pressure on us to go into the streets to protest but we don’t believe protest should be the first port of call. All we are told is that we the Nigerian students need to protest in order to coerce the government into meeting the demands of ASUU but we want to know firsthand what the government has done to ensure the reopening of our universities as soon as possible,” he said.
LEADERSHIP
Short URL: http://www.osundefender.org/?p=119567
Posted by on Sep 4 2013. Filed under AFRICA, ANNOUNCEMENT, ENTERTAINMENT, FEATURE, FOR THE RECORDS, From The Press, Front Page Story, INTERVIEW, NEWS, News Across Nigeria. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

13 Comments for “ASUU Strike: Why FG Released Only N30bn — Suswam”

  1. nice
    I don’t knw d purpose of dis useless asuu, y are dey doing dis to we student,FG hav done dere part, y can’t dey reconcile and call off d strike den go back to table for renegotiate.everybody knw dey re fighting for dere own interest nt we student. Am very sure dat if FG release d 92billion for dem today, asuu will call off d strike. foolish asuu
    • Anonymous
      Am surprise at ur comment so if u are d lecturer and u are owe ten naira and u protested and ur employ give u two naira u wil collect and thank God abi? Frm ur comment it has shown d kind of undergraduate u are make sound comment and dont show ur ignorant in public i pity ur parent who are wasting money on u in sch
    • Frm Marcus Y s irt dat asuu a very very stupid n not calnoff d strik for studnt to return bk to scu?
      Y s asuu so so stupid n caln of d strik?
    • Anonymous
      asuu useless? you call your teachers useless? what then can you benefit from useless people? maybe the strike is called off today and you are made to pay 10k for each chapter of yr project before approval, pay for yr teachers to come to class if the class size is more than 70 people and also pay for yr marks, consumables for research,and forced to bring your generators to class then you will understand how useless asuu can be!
  2. Anonymous
    pls my frnd, mind ur comment. stop using abusive language on any of the party rather pray God’s intervention.
    • Anonymous
      Leave God out of dis tell FG if u care to give d complete money moreover non of d executive members are being owe a dime or if are they saying they are not owing d lecturers?
  3. nice
    @ anonymous,I can c u don’t hav sense at all, hv already knew d kind of person u re, dis is nt my first time of reading ur comment, all ur comment concerning d protest shows dat u always follow wateva people say, so I can’t blame u, if u listen to news I believe dat ur locked brain will open.u will knw wat asuu is fighting for.maybe ur father is among those thieves lecturer. Idiot
  4. ade
    Anonymous, y re u criticising student like u, instead of u to support him, if u listen to news yesterday,u will know wat dis guy is saying is d truth. Suswam said dey FG can’t just released d money for dem without a verification by the university council which is d truth.if u hav a company and ur workers just demand for some allowances without verification, will u give dem?
  5. ade
    Anonymous, y re u criticising a student like u, instead of u to support him, if u listen to news yesterday,u will know wat dis guy is saying is d truth. Suswam said dey FG can’t just released d money for dem without a verification by the university council which is d truth.if u hav a company and ur workers just demand for some allowances without verification, will u give dem?
    • Anonymous
      ade. sorry you have to believe a man who has been collecting salary for the past six months and his primary school teachers are on strike for more than six months this concluded academic year. same thing happened two sessions ago in his state. back to the bone of contention. three yrs ago cbn governor bailed three banks out with 400 billion without budgetary allocation and nobody said a thing. 92 billion covers excess workload and responsibility allowances. if you are sincere, how many lecturers have class size lass than 50 people to teach? what of marking of scripts? in some cases, a lecturer may be teaching more than two courses per semester and it is assumed that the class size is he unesco standard. haba! let govt not pay and keep establishing universities here and there and lets see how the economy will improve,
      supporting nice? his sentence construction is appalling for an undergraduate if he is one. lets build the educational sector with constructive criticism
  6. Jejelayegba
    I think the issue on ground is that of agreement so FG should honour it. If the President could spend a whole day in his party’s convention, can’t he meet with ASUU himself as a lecturer instead delegating such to people who do not know the value of education.
  7. […] The Ibadan Zone of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), on Wednesday, described the claim by the Federal Government that it has released a sum of N130 billion, to universities, as a fraud. RELATED POST: ASUU Strike: Why FG Released Only N30bn — Suswam […]

Leave a Reply






Why FG Does Not Want ASUU Strike To End

Nigerian universities have been buffeted with agonising months of strikes for over a decade and until now, the article is pretty much the identical. Government is still reluctant to give the education part a shot in the arm.
learned Staff amalgamation of Universities, ASUU, has been on strike since June 30 and has dialogued with FG over 11 times, albeit, inconclusively.
This highlights the lukewarm posture of government in the direction of the striking lecturers and from ASUU’s body dialect and utterances, they have made it abundantly clear to any person who cares to listen that they are prepared to extend the strike even if it takes years, asserting that their conclusion was adequately taken in a bid to revitalise Nigerian universities.
Why Federal Government Does Not Want ASUU Strike To End
The bone of contention is lucid in itself. An affirmation was reached in 2009 that all government universities would require a total sum of N1.5 trillion disperse over three years (2009-2011) to address the rot and decay in the universities.
But, in the Memorandum of Understanding, MoU, marked between the union and the government in 2012, FG determined to continue the gesture to encompass both government and state universities. After the 2012 reconsider, it was agreed that rather than of N1.5 trillion, FG would infuse a total of N1.3 trillion into the universities over four years.
Almost four years down the line, FG has refused to fulfill its end of the cut-rate. Rather than reply to the matters increased by the amalgamation that would double-check fast tenacity to the imbroglio, government boycotted ASUU to summon a gathering with Pro-Chancellors and Vice-Chancellors of universities, proposing them N130 billion with a equivalent alignment to lecturers to resume work directly.
But the amalgamation is asserting that by throwing money at universities in that kind, government has rejected the 2009 affirmation it went into freely with the union and the 2012 MoU. ASUU is not making any fresh demand but has maintained that the 2009 affirmation must be respected.
It is silly that government agents were cited as saying ASUU’s N1.3 trillion demand is adept of closing down the homeland. No. Their insatiable and rapacious greed will.
The private jets in the presidential fleet can go by plane, centenary celebrations is a main concern to government, there’s sufficient cash to pay humongous wages and allowances to government legislators and other political agency holders, enough to forfeit to oil grant thieves, enough to pay militants false amnesty cheques and phantom contracts while they extend to bunker our crude oil like not ever before, there’s sufficient cash to plead Boko Haram to accept amnesty but there is no cash for regulation abiding Nigerian students who desire to eke out a living using university education as a pacing stone. It is this kind of attitude from the government that provokes the use of brute force by some local assemblies to appeal government’s vigilance to their difficulties.
Government will not assertion it has no money to fulfill this affirmation. A homeland with 109 senators earning about N19.6 billion a year, while N51.8 billion is spent on members of House of Representatives for the identical time span, totaling N71.4 billion.
This addition, N71.4 billion, comprises 17.8 per cent of the N400bn annual intervention finance suggested by the managing group on Needs evaluation of Nigerian Universities. Surely, our lecturers and universities where they were taught warrant more.
When we converse of heath care, proceedvernment authorized and the ruling elite proceed abroad for medical vigilance; we converse of awful streets, they go by plane personal jets; we converse of power, they run their homes on 24-7 alternate electrical energy source; now we’re talking learning, their wards are in some of the best universities abroad. There is no way the myriad of problems bedeviling the homeland can be undertook if the political elite don’t feel the pangs.
That Mr. leader has taken out time from his ‘busy’ schedule to certainly parley with the warring factions of his party, PDP, but has not ever sat down with ASUU constituents to journal a course for Nigeria’s managers of tomorrow apparently shows his main concerns. Party activities and following perceived foes of his 2015 ambition round with apparatus of state are far more significant things than angling over rearwards to pander to the claims of the hitting lecturers.
But then, government should take into cognisance the fact that, the longer the students remain at dwelling, possibilities are that they will be lured into social vices. The aftermath can be catastrophic for the state.
There are misplaced calls in some quarters for ASUU to be ‘reasonable’, accept FG’s offer and come back to school rooms. Others lambast them for being selfish and unpatriotic. It is unfortunate that Nigerians are habitually looking for quick rectify answers to monumental difficulties. Less endowed nations like Ghana, Botswana and Angola are making giant paces on all fronts because the citizenry have at one point or the other asserted that the needful be done. Here, any thing hurled at us is accepted with glee.
We should get our priorities right as a homeland. Government should constrain its own excesses. learning should be given the vigilance it deserves. learning of the citizenry should not be subjected to any form of discussion. Negotiating the learning of our leaders of tomorrow is more or less negotiating the future of the homeland.
Government deliberately likes the strike to linger, first, to blackmail the disagreement. There have been some unsavoury comments from the government’s split up of the negotiation table that ASUU has been infiltrated by moles from the disagreement, alleging that the strike has lingered to gain political capital. That is how reduced this government can stoop. We have glimpsed it before. It is an irresponsible and shameless government, one that needs integrity and honesty that will accuse the opposition for all its anguish. It is unbecoming for the government of the day to continue to heap its malfunction on the landing of the disagreement and ASUU strike is just another avenue to decorate the opposition black before the public.
Second, is to send a powerful signal to other unions who might be considering alike activity to have a rethink. possibly, government conceives by acceding to ASUU’s claims, other work unions might toe the identical route at the smallest excuse.
Third, the supreme aim of government is to decorate a bad image of the association to Nigerians, at smallest, for as long as the strike perseveres. The administrator Gabriel Suswan-led NEEDS Report Implementation managing group mediating on behalf of the government has regrettably taken a place that is untrue, dishonest, and calculated to misinform the public and cause disaffection in the direction of the union.
Rather than request cheap attractiveness, Governor Suswan and the rest of the FG group should tow the part of respect by inquiring
leader Goodluck Jonathan to respect the 2009 agreement. There’s no cornerstone for rotating the heat on ASUU and the crusade of calumny.
It calls for concern, that same government that has always maintained that ‘our graduates are unemployable’ and our universities churn out ‘half-baked graduates’ find it difficult to commit the much required funds to revamp the universities.

Strike: ASUU dragged to industrial court

THE strike action embarked upon by university lecturers has assumed another dimension as the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has been dragged before the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) over the lingering strike action.
The suit, with the number NICW/Abj/242/2013 which also has ministers of labour and productivity, education, finance and justice, as well as secretary to the government of the federation as defendants, was instituted by the registered trustees of Golden Women of Integrity and Vision Association and Mrs. Florence Uche Ojieh.
In the suit, the claimants are asking the court to determine whether the strike action embarked upon by ASUU is not illegal and contrary to law and whether members of the union are not bound by the policy of ‘no work no pay’ and therefore not entitled to their salary during the period of the strike.
They also asked the court to determine whether members of ASUU are entitled to continue to retain their employment, having abandoned or deemed to have abandoned their work in the universities; whether or not the union complied with the mandatory provisions of Section 4 and 5 of the Trade Dispute Act CAP T8 LFN 2004 before embarking on the strike; whether the union has complied with the provision of Section 8 of the Trade Disputes Act CAP T8 LFN 2004; whether or not the minister of education is not entitled to determine the employment of the union, same having abandoned or deemed to have abandoned their work in their universities and whether or not the doctrine of collective bargain or the purported 2009 agreement can be the basis for the strike action by ASUU same not having been incorporated in their contract of employment between it and the federal government.
The reliefs sought by the claimants include a declaration that the strike action embarked upon by ASUU since July 2, 2013 is illegal, unconstitutional, null and void.
The claimants also sought a declaration of court that the strike action is unlawful and unwarranted in the face of the payment to the union by federal government of over N50 billion to meet ASUU’s demands from the government.
Other reliefs are an order of mandatory injunction directing the union to go back to work immediately and unconditionally; an order directing the union to return or refund all monies paid to it by the federal government in error or otherwise; an order directing ASUU to return to the negotiation table and a declaration that the strike action is illegal, unconstitutional, null and void.
Others are an order directing ASUU to refund all monies paid to its members as salaries, wages and allowances during the strike action; an order enforcing the no work no pay rule on the union; a declaration that the condition precedent to protest and or strike as provided by the Trade Dispute Act Cap T8 LFN 2004 has not been fulfilled; an order declaring the agreement on which the strike action is based as an extra-legal document which have no force of law; an order declaring any step taken or any further step to be taken in relation to the industrial action by ASUU, agents, privies, assignors, sympathizers, successors or any person whatsoever by whatever name so-called as illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional and an interim order restraining any other trade union and association from joining, participating and aligning with the ASUU strike.

ASUU Strike: Bishops Offer to Mediate between FG, Lecturers

By Seriki Adinoyi 
The Catholic Bishops Conference of Nigeria (CBCN) has offered to mediate in the protracted rift between the federal government and the Academic Staff of Union Universities (ASUU) over the implementation of the 2009 ASUU/FG agreement between the two parties.
Rising from its 2013 second plenary meeting in Otukpo, Benue State, yesterday, the bishops observed that the ongoing rift had crippled the education system in the country, and urged the federal government and the leadership of ASUU to come down from their stern positions and resolve their differences in the interest of the students.
In a communiqué, signed by the President of CBCN, Most Reverend Ignatius Kaigama, who doubles as the bishop of the Archdiocese of Jos, and the Secretary, Most Reverend Williams Avenga, who is also the bishop of Gboko, and made available to journalists in Jos, Plateau State, the bishops expressed regret that university students have been made to roam about the streets, following the indefinite strike.
The clerics stated that they could no longer afford to remain indifferent, while the future of the youths was being mortgaged.
The communiquĂ© said: “We are disturbed by the crippling effect of the strike. As stakeholders in the education of our youths, we cannot stay aloof. We appeal to the federal government and ASUU to take the higher ground of mutual exchange and shifting of grounds for the collective responsibility of saving our university education and getting our youths back to the classrooms.
“We, the Catholic Bishops willingly offer ourselves as a conference to mediate in order to bring this deadlock to an end and usher in a harmonious, viable and sustainable environment for university learning.”
The bishops also lamented the denial of Catholics to acquire land to establish chaplaincy by some university authorities, adding that the action had contributed to the weakening of sound moral in the lives of the youths, who are the future leaders.
The clerics called on the federal government to foster religious freedom by allocating lands and removing all barriers to acquiring lands for religious worships.
On security, the CBCN congratulated the federal government on the bold measures adopted in combating the menace of the Boko Haram sect, which had reduced the acts of terrorism in the country, especially in Borno, Adamawa, and Yobe States.
While reiterating the need for good governance, the conference noted that the quality of life in Nigeria does not reflect the level of the country's immense human and natural resources.
The clerics also called for higher observance in the right and respect to lives and condemned attempts to introduce unwholesome values to the society by foreign agencies in their campaign for abortion. Supply of condoms and promotion of same-sex union and commended the Senate for its firm stand and outright rejection of the bill on same-sex marriage.

ASUU has been on strike since June 30. The Vice President Namadi Sambo has, in a bid to end the continuous gridlock in the dialogue between the Academic Staff Union of Universities, ASUU and federal government, taken over the negotiation process. The government’s negotiation team was formerly headed by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Pius Anyim. For the first time since the commencement of the over 10-week-old strike action by the union, the Vice President met with the leadership of the union at the Presidential Villa on Thursday. The meeting was held behind closed doors. Nigerian Universities have been shut down since June 30 as a result of federal government’s failure to honour an agreement signed between it and ASUU in 2009 bothering on issues of university funding and improvement of infrastructure in the sector. Speaking to journalists at the Presidential Villa after the closed door meeting, the ASUU President, Nasir Fagge, said that he was taking back a “message given to him at the meeting for his members” and that Nigerians would have to wait for the response of his members on the way forward. “We have had a meeting with the Vice President and he has given us a message to our members, and we said that as the messengers that we are, we are going to deliver the message faithfully to our members and then they will take the decision.” According to him, “I know Nigerians are expecting a solution to the strike, we also want a solution, but I have been given a message to our members. The message is not for Nigerians, it is for our members”. “If I deliver the message, our principal will decide and we will get back to the ministry of education within this week,” he added, saying the union would get back to the education minister on its stance on the government’s latest offer. The federal government had offered N100 billion and N30 billion for infrastructure development in various universities and payment of verified earned allowances of lecturers respectively. It is not clear if the government made an improved offer for the lecturers whose only demand is that government implements fully the 2009 agreement. The Minister of State for Education, Nyesom Wike, who was also at the meeting, explained that the meeting had been convened to find a lasting solution to the crisis. “One is quit hopeful that ASUU is committed, they have the passion and that there is the need for us to move the education sector forward. “ASUU coming to discuss means that they are committed on their own part and that the federal government is also committed. We have gone very far, we believe that in no distance time, you will have a very good result,” he said. Also on the ASUU delegation were two former Presidents of ASUU, Dipo Fasina and Abdullahi Sule-Kano. Other members of the government’s delegation included the Executive Secretary of the National Universities Commission (NUC), Julius Okojie; as well as the Vice Chancellors of Bayero University Kano (BUK), University of Ibadan (UI) and Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University (ATBU) Bauchi, Abdulrasheed Abubakar, Isaac Adewole, and Muhammed Muhammed respectively.

ASUU has been on strike for about 3 months.
The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has blamed the rot in the Nigerian university system on the Executive Secretary of the National University Commission, Julius Okojie, saying his failure to insist on quality has bastardised Nigerian universities.
The lecturers also vowed to continue their strike unless the federal government honours the 2009 agreement it had with the union.
In a statement signed by its University of Ibadan branch chairman, Olusegun Ajiboye, ASUU renewed its call for the scraping or a total overhaul of the regulatory institution if the nation wishes to get it right in university education management.
While calling on the National Assembly to beam its searchlight on the activities of the NUC, Mr. Ajiboye said the recent NEEDS assessment report on universities reflects how much the commission has failed in its duties as a regulator.
According to him, the report undertaken by genuine academics contradicts NUC’s accreditation exercises which gave ‘controversial’ clean bill of health to most universities through “magomago accreditation.”
The union contended that only in a society like Nigeria would Mr. Okojie still remain in office after being heavily indicted in the report, saying “in sane climes, the NUC boss ought to have resigned through the revelations made in the NEEDS assessment report.”
Mr. Okojie had, last week, absorbed his commission of any wrongdoing in the rot plaguing public universities in the country, particularly as regards undeserved accreditation, blaming members of the ASUU instead.
Mr. Ajiboye, who described the statement credited to the NUC boss as ‘careless’, accused Mr. Okojie of using his cronies who can do his biddings to embark on accreditation.
He said the success of the 2011 elections was based on the patriotic zeal and contributions of genuine and patriotic ASUU members nationwide saying that was why the election was free of hanky-panky recorded in past elections.
The ASUU statement titled ‘Where Okojie Got It Wrong,’ insisted that the NUC boss is fond of using his ‘yes sir’ boys to do hatchet jobs during accreditations, thereby compromising quality most of the time.
The union said its almost three-month-old strike is fully on, adding that the it would not allow itself to be fooled again with ‘promisory notes’ of the federal government which had never worked in the past.
“ASUU cannot be blamed for NUC ‘magomago’ accreditations. Rather than blaming the Union, Okojie should take full responsibility for all the fraudulent deeds in the NUC, including the work and eat accreditations.
“The NUC knows the kind of academics they select for their ignoble exercises. These are cronnies of the big man in the NUC. They can never say no to his biddings. Nigerians should be proud of ASUU in it’s efforts at repositioning public universities in the country. One of these major efforts is the NEEDS Assessment Document.
“This was a product of a rigorous academic exercise carried out by dependable and credible members of our Union. Unlike the numerous faulty accreditation reports which had given these universities clean bill of health, the NEEDS Assessment Report stands out as a classical document of reference detailing the rot and decay in public universities in Nigeria. All well meaning Nigerians can see the contrast between okojie’s ‘packaged accreditation reports’ and a credible job done by ASUU.
“It has become very clear from the Needs Assessment that Okojie and his cohort of accreditors have fooled this country for too long. Enough they say is enough. Time is now for the Government to beam a searchlight on the activities of the NUC.
“The Education Committees in both the Senate and House of Representatives have an arduous task to do here. Nigerians are calling for dismantling of an omnibus body that has done the country more harm than good. NUC must go.
“Professor Julius Okojie cannot absolve himself from the rot in the university system by regulating quantity instead of ensuring quality delivery,” ASUU said.

ASUU Strike latest: VP Sambo takes over government’s negotiation

ASUU has been on strike since June 30.
The Vice President Namadi Sambo has, in a bid to end the continuous gridlock in the dialogue between the Academic Staff Union of Universities, ASUU and federal government, taken over the negotiation process. The government’s negotiation team was formerly headed by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Pius Anyim.
For the first time since the commencement of the over 10-week-old strike action by the union, the Vice President met with the leadership of the union at the Presidential Villa on Thursday.
The meeting was held behind closed doors.
Nigerian Universities have been shut down since June 30 as a result of federal government’s failure to honour an agreement signed between it and ASUU in 2009 bothering on issues of university funding and improvement of infrastructure in the sector.
Speaking to journalists at the Presidential Villa after the closed door meeting, the ASUU President, Nasir Fagge, said that he was taking back a “message given to him at the meeting for his members” and that Nigerians would have to wait for the response of his members on the way forward.
“We have had a meeting with the Vice President and he has given us a message to our members, and we said that as the messengers that we are, we are going to deliver the message faithfully to our members and then they will take the decision.”
According to him, “I know Nigerians are expecting a solution to the strike, we also want a solution, but I have been given a message to our members. The message is not for Nigerians, it is for our members”.
“If I deliver the message, our principal will decide and we will get back to the ministry of education within this week,” he added, saying the union would get back to the education minister on its stance on the government’s latest offer.
The federal government had offered N100 billion and N30 billion for infrastructure development in various universities and payment of verified earned allowances of lecturers respectively. It is not clear if the government made an improved offer for the lecturers whose only demand is that government implements fully the 2009 agreement.
The Minister of State for Education, Nyesom Wike, who was also at the meeting, explained that the meeting had been convened to find a lasting solution to the crisis.
“One is quit hopeful that ASUU is committed, they have the passion and that there is the need for us to move the education sector forward.
“ASUU coming to discuss means that they are committed on their own part and that the federal government is also committed. We have gone very far, we believe that in no distance time, you will have a very good result,” he said.
Also on the ASUU delegation were two former Presidents of ASUU, Dipo Fasina and Abdullahi Sule-Kano.
Other members of the government’s delegation included the Executive Secretary of the National Universities Commission (NUC), Julius Okojie; as well as the Vice Chancellors of Bayero University Kano (BUK), University of Ibadan (UI) and Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University (ATBU) Bauchi, Abdulrasheed Abubakar, Isaac Adewole, and Muhammed Muhammed respectively.

Nigeria Hit By Shortage of Voluntary Blood Donors

With less than 10 percent of Nigerians donating blood voluntarily, the country is currently reeling under the onslaught of serious shortage of safe blood and blood products, even as opinion leaders in the country, particularly, those in the rural communities have been urged to lead by example by donating blood voluntarily.
Nigeria is currently faced with a situation, whereby 60 percent of all blood donations are from commercial donors and 30 percent from family replacement.
Minister of Health, Professor Onyebuchi Chukwu, remarked that 1,130,000 units of blood are collected annually in the country through the various types of donations as against 1,336,000 estimates of blood units required.
The deficit, according to the Minister, has resulted in numerous preventable death especially among women and children and people living with certain diseases.
Making the call during a blood donor drive organised by the Lagos State Blood Transfusion Committee, LSBTC, in conjunction with the State Water Corporation, Mr. Solomon Eka, Member, LSBTC, maintained that as long as Nigerian opinion leaders are opposed to blood donation, the country will remain far from attaining the required blood units for survival of patients.
"Presently there are some opinion leaders that do not support blood donation. If these opinion leaders are meant to have a change of attitude, and also demonstrate by donating blood, their followers will also follow suit. So we need the opinion leaders to drive the campaign in the communities. To let people know that blood donation is not risky and is not having any negative effect."
In his lecture entitled; "Importance of Voluntary Blood Donation", Eka explained that regular blood donation also helps refresh an individual's blood. He said the State blood donation drive has helped discover hidden diseases in many persons walking around with blood disorders without knowing. Encouraging cultivation of the culture of donating blood every three months, he explained that not every donated blood is useable.
"It is not everybody that can donate, you must attain certain criteria before you donate, which include; you must be 50 kg and above, blood pressure must be normal, PVC must at an acceptable level to avoid any unforeseen crisis. Only healthy people aged 18 -65 are likely to donate blood," he added.
Chief Matron, Lagos State Water Corporation Staff Clinic, Aderoju Olusola, who noted that the exercise was part of their monthly health talk aimed at inculcating healthy living into the staff of the corporation.
Olusola, who acknowledged that most Nigerians are afraid to donate blood out of fear, said donors stand to gain refreshed blood as well as prolonged life.
Voluntary blood donation also helps to assist persons in need of blood, accident victims, cancer patients, sickle cell anaemia patients and pregnant women in labour among others.
Nigeria
Kenya Attack - Nigeria's Shopping Malls Beef Up Security
Following the terrorist attack on Westgate Shopping Mall in Nairobi, Kenya, security has been beefed up at shopping … see more »

We Have Started Agani In The Face of all These Crisis Asuu Still On Srike ( Nigeria: Why Goodluck Jonathan Must Run for a Second-Term)

There is a lot of irritating noise coming especially from the North-West concerning the need for the presidency to return to the North in 2015. This should be discarded as sound and fury signifying nothing. To talk of the presidency returning to the North is to presume the presidency belongs to the North. It does not! There should be no Northern president of Nigeria for the next 14 years at the very least. After that, the presidency should not go to the North-West. It should go to the Middle-Belt. The new PDP: In the last few weeks, we have witnessed a comedy of errors whereby some PDP Governors, mostly Northern, have rebelled from the PDP, formed what they call a new PDP with one central demand: that Goodluck Jonathan should not contest for the presidency in 2015. This makes for good newspaper headlines and little else.
It is preposterous to insist that a sitting president should not go for a second-term when he is entitled to do so. Those who are opposed to him should challenge him at the polls if they can. In my opinion, they don't stand a chance against him and they know it.
This is a Nigerian thing. If you start a business and are successful, your competition does not strive to match or exceed your services. The favoured option is to try to drive you out of business. They will pay the police to close you down.
They will go to the babalawo and ask him to terminate you with extreme prejudice. You will come to your office and find a dead chicken on the doormat. What all this says eloquently is that your competition cannot compete with you. The same goes for the shenanigans of the so-called new PDP. There is nothing new about these jokers.
All they have to offer is the same bad news. The reality they don't want to face is that Jonathan is unstoppable as the PDP presidential candidate in 2015. A new PDP candidate does not even have a look-in. Neither does a PDM candidate, which Atiku is apparently reserving as his fall-back position when his shenanigans in the PDP come to nothing.
It sometimes takes Nigerians a long time to face reality and admit defeat. This is the case with Atiku Abubakar. The bitter truth is that, try as he might, Atiku can never be president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The 2015 election will be between President Jonathan and the APC presidential candidate. The only opportunity that the North has to produce the next president lies in the APC putting forward a Northerner as its presidential candidate. Even then, President Jonathan must be the odds-on favourite to win. As a rule, sitting African presidents don't lose elections.

Friday 20 September 2013

PDP Crisis: Why we fight Tukur, by Kwankwaso, Aliyu

KANO — Two of the ‘rebel’ governors in the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Governors Rabiu Kwankwaso of Kano and Babangida Aliyu, yesterday, opened up on the crisis in the party, saying their agitation is ultimately aimed at purifying the party and saving it from self-destruction.
Speaking to stakeholders in Kano,  Kwankwaso accused the Bamanga Tukur-led leadership of the party of insensitivity to complaints of party members even as he disclosed that the G-7 had concluded plans to reform the party.
Governor Aliyu, who spoke in the same vein in a lecture he delivered at the Lagos Country Club, yesterday, described the internal crisis in the party as a discussion that will ultimately lead to purification of the party.
Kwankwaso disclosed that party members had, under the Tukur leadership, been subjected to various forms of intimidation in a bid to satisfy the wishes of “microscopic individuals” at the expense of the interest of the overall majority.

Pandemonium in House of Reps as Baraje PDP Visits print

Members of Nigeria’s House of Representatives returned from their eight weeks vacation on Tuesday and were sucked straight into the crisis rocking the ruling Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.
There have been speculations that the division within the Nigeria ruling PDP which has led to the creation of a faction of the party may result in a major crisis in the National Assembly where the party has majority of members.
Over 50 members of the House and about 27 Senators have already pledged loyalty to the breakaway faction of the party led by Alhaji Kawu Baraje and supported by seven governors elected on the party’s platform.
The speculation became real when Honourable Aminu Tambuwal, the Speaker informed members at the plenary that the leadership of the New PDP would visit the caucus to address them on activities of the party.
He read out the request of the new PDP convened in a letter addressed to the Speaker signed by the secretary of the party, Chief Olagunsoye Oyinlola.

PDP Crisis: G57 House Members May Leave PDP

By Onwuka Nzeshi      
The group of 57 members of the House of Representatives (G57) who recently declared their support for the Kawu Baraje faction of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) may part ways completely with the PDP if the crisis  rocking the ruling party was not resolved soon.
This indication emerged just as condemnation trailed Friday's political drama  in which Governor Chibuike Amaechi of Rivers State was allegedly barred from entering the Rivers Government House in Port Harcourt.
Chairman House Committee on Petroleum Resources (Downstream) Chairman, House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Hon.  Zakari Mohammed who dropped this hint yesterday said the  intra-party crisis, which has already created a division in the ranks of the ruling party may snowball into mass defection of lawmakers to other political parties if the leaders of the ruling party failed to reach a consensus on the fate of the party.

PDP crisis and the National Assembly: An endgame?

PERHAPS by the end of the year, the crisis in the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) could rank as the most dominant and contentious issue in the polity. For more than four months, the gladiators have been at one another’s jugular.  The dogfight, which got messier last Saturday as the party split into two distinct factions, has culminated in threats and counter-threats by the dramatis personae.
Thus, the belligerent forces have kept expanding the battle grounds from the regular court rooms to other frontiers, even despite the trouble-shooting missions initiated by some distinguished personalities within the PDP family.
On the whole, the festering intra-party crisis has ripped open the various organs and structures of the PDP, leading to the ripple effects on other strategic institutions like the executive and legislative arms of government such as that has characterised the politics of Rivers State since the disputed chairmanship election in the Nigeria Governors Forum in May. The frightening dimension of the PDP crisis at the national level ostensibly necessitated the surprise visits of the Senate President, David Mark, to two former leaders, Generals Ibrahim Babangida and Abdulsalami Abubakar, in Minna, Niger State, during the week.
The break-up of the ruling party that has led into two claimants as its national chairman - Alhaji Bamanga Tukur and Abubakar Baraje - is underscored by the number of members of the National Assembly elected on the party’s platform, who have teamed up with the New PDP. As of Wednesday, no fewer than 124 of the lawmakers had declared for the Baraje-led faction. But Alhaji Tukur, on Wednesday, threatened to declare the seats of the affected lawmakers vacant if they failed to withdraw their loyalty to the New PDP. On Monday, at least 26 senators and 57 other House members were reported to have pledged their allegiance to the Baraje-led PDP, which parades a former PDP National Secretary of the party, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola; former Deputy National Chairman, Dr Sam Jaja, as well as former Vice-President Alhaji Atiku Abubakar;  Governors Sule Lamido (Jigawa),  Babangida Aliyu (Niger), Aliyu Wamakko (Sokoto), Abdulfatai Ahmed (Kwara),   Rotimi Amaechi (Rivers) and Rabiu Kwakwanso (Kano).
Tukur was quoted on Thursday as saying, “All persons elected on the platform of our great party at all levels who identify with these enemies of the oneness and greatness of our party shall have their seats declared vacant as required by law. We shall leave no stone unturned to ensure that such persons and indeed any other individuals who attempt to subvert the leadership of the PDP shall reap in full, the consequences of such actions.”
But the spokesman of the House of Representatives, Zakari Mohammed, who was one of the 57 House members that declared support for the New PDP on Monday, urged the embattled party’s top shot to be abreast of the provisions of the relevant laws “before jumping to conclusions.”
However, the PDP, under the leadership of Baraje, said it had asked its lawyers to press a contempt charge against Tukur for flouting the orders of a Lagos high court which asked both sides to maintain the status quo pending the resolution of the case before it on who should lead the party.
A statement issued by the National Secretary of the PDP under Baraje, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, condemned the press conference addressed by Tukur in Abuja on Wednesday where he threatened to sack members of the National Assembly who have declared support for the Baraje faction and arrest its officers.
“We have asked our lawyers to press contempt charges against Tukur because his statement was made in clear contempt of the orders of Lagos high court which three days ago asked both sides to maintain the status quo. We will ask the court to commit him to jail for his disdain for the law and the judicial system.
“We have always been saying it that Tukur represents everything that must not be seen in a democratic organisation. His statement demonstrates not just impunity, but also lawlessness and crass ignorance of the tenets of the law and democratic ethos.
“Tukur displayed his disdain for law and order with his threat to order the arrest of law abiding persons in a democracy.  We ask what powers he has under our laws to make that statement and what gave him the impression that Nigeria has become a police state where impunity reigns and citizens can be arrested at the whim of any power-drunk tzar. Fortunately, our country is a democracy under the rule of law and not under the rule of man. The police and our other security agencies cannot be used to further such agenda as being nurtured in the dictatorial mind of Tukur.
“Again, we believe only an ignorant person would threaten to sack elected Senators and Representatives for staying on the side of truth, justice and fairness. Tukur needs be reminded that members of the National Assembly were elected by the people of Nigeria and are not his appointees who he could dismiss like the minions in his private residence.
“He called the Alhaji Baraje- led leadership of our party impostors and we ask him if he does not know that the endorsement of our cause by elected representatives of our people across all tiers of government has vindicated our position that what we represent in the party today is what the people want.
“We challenge him to call out those who are with him in his clear journey to perdition even as we add that  Tukur should come to terms with the reality of the end of his reign of terror, impunity, dictatorship and lawlessness in our party.
“On our part, we re-assert our commitment to the consolidation of democracy, peace, love, unity, people centred development and above all, the rule of law in our march towards progress and development.  More importantly, we assure our teeming associates and well wishers that we shall conduct our party’s business with patriotism, resourcefulness, truth, justice and fair play as demanded of a political organisation with a vision and mission,” the statement said.
Also, 57 House of Representatives members on Tuesday, in a statement, said: “We, the members of the House of Representatives on the platform of the New PDP, hereby congratulate our leaders on the emergence of the new party.
“Although a sizeable number of our members who could not append their signatures because of their unavailability in the country will do so immediately on arrival, we the undersigned salute and appreciate the courage, sacrifice and resilience and patriotism of our leaders namely: former Vice-president Atiku Abubakar, and the Governors of Kano State, Dr Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, Aliyu Wammako (Sokoto), Murtala Nyako (Adamawa), Sule Lamido (Jigawa), Dr Muazu Babangida Aliyu (Niger), Abdul Fattah Ahmed (Kwara), and Chibuike Amaechi(Rivers), and other well-meaning and eminent Nigerians for leading the way for the emergence of the New PDP.
“We are also using this opportunity to condemn, in strong terms, attempts by some agents of the Federal Government to use state apparatus to witch-hunt some of these patriots for taking this bold and courageous step.
“As members of the House of Representatives, we call on the security agencies and other anti-graft bodies to be professional in their activities and not allow themselves be used by anybody, no matter how highly placed, for their political ambitions. Remember how you want history to judge your tenures.
“We won’t hesitate however to use all instruments of law within our powers as provided by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), to stop this and bring anybody found wanting to book.
“We wish to state that, by this statement, we pledge our loyalty and support to the New PDP under the able chairmanship of Alhaji Abubakar Kawu Baraje, the Deputy Chairman, Dr Sam SamJaja, National secretary, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinola and other members of the National Executive Committee.
“We congratulate them and wish them the very best as they steer the affairs of our party to provide level playing-field for all Nigerians.”
The 57 House of Representatives members who signed the letter are: Hon. Abdullahi Balarabe, Hon. Abdulmumin Jibrin, Hon. Ali Ahmad, Hon. Abdullahi Muhammad Wamako, Hon. Abdullahi Muhammed Rico, Hon. Abdulmalik Usman Cheche, Hon. Adamu Bashir, Hon. Ahman-Patigi Aliyu, Hon. Ahmed Zerewa, Hon. Aishatu Ahmed Binani, Hon. Aiyedun Akeem Olayinka, Hon. Alhassan Ado Garba, Hon. Aliyu Madaki, Hon. Aliyu Shehu, Hon. Aminu Shagari, Hon. Aminu Sulyman, Hon. Aminu Tukur, Hon. Andrew Uchendu, Hon. Asita Honourable, Hon. Bashir Baballe, Hon. Blessing Nsiegbe, Hon. Dakuku Peterside, Hon. Dawari George and Hon. Faruq Muhammed Lawan. Others include Hon. Gibson Nathaniel, Hon. Gogo Bright Tamunu, Hon. Haliru Zakari Jikantoro, Hon. Hassan Adamu, Hon. Hussain Namadi, Hon. Ibrahim Ebbo, Hon. Ibrahim Tijjani Kivawa, Hon. Issa Bashir, Hon. Kabiru Achida, Hon. Khabeeb Mustapha, Hon. Maurice Pronen, Hon.Mohammed Sabo, Hon. Mpigi Barinada, Hon. Muhammad Ahmed Mukhtar, Hon. Muhammad Ibrahim, Hon. Muhammad Sani Kutigi, Hon. Mukhtari Muhammad, Hon. Musa Ado and Hon. Musa Sarkin-Adar, Others are Hon. Mustapha Bala Dawaki, Hon. Mustapha Mashood, Hon. Ogbonna Nwuke, Hon. Rafiu Ibrahim, Hon. Sa’ad Nabunkari, Hon. Sani Muhammed Aliyu, Hon. Shuaibu Gobir, Hon. Sokonte Davies, Hon. Sufiyanu Ubale, Hon. Umar Bature, Hon. Usman Wada, Hon. Yusuph Dunari Sule, Hon. Yusuph Galambi and Hon. Zakari Muhammed.
Should the threat to support the Baraje-led New PDP see the light of the day, the ruling party’s status will be dwarfed in the National Assembly.   In the Senate, PDP had 74 senators as against the opposition All Progressives Congress’ 29; Labour Party has four while APGA has one. However, now that 26 of the PDP’s 74 have “ported” to New PDP, the party’s number has reduced to 48.
Should ongoing inter-party consultations germinate, the 48 PDP senators would become a minority because an alliance between the APC with 29 members and the New PDP’s 26 would translate to 55 against the PDP’s 48. There are a total of 109 members in the Senate.
In the Hosue of Representatives, the PDP’s hitherto advantage of 205 members has shrunk to 103 with the endorsement of the Baraje-led faction by the rebellious 102 lawmakers. Thus, any cooperation between the APC’s 135 and the new PDP’s 102 makes 237 as against the PDP’s 103. Two-thirds of the total House membership of 360 is 240, and there lies the danger for the PDP.
 Meanwhile, the chairman of the Board of Trustees (BoT) of the PDP, Chief Tony Anenih, in a statement in Abuja during the week, said he believed some of the aggrieved governors had genuine grievances.
“I believe some of them have genuine grievances, but I have hope that once the grievances are addressed, they will come back.  I am happy that the PDP has an internal mechanism for effective conflict resolution, and, at the end of the day, the problems will be addressed and the PDP will come out of the crisis stronger,” he said.

Power of recall
The 1999 Constitution is succinct in its provision on the process for the recall of any erring lawmaker. Section 110 states, “A member of the House of Assembly may be recalled as such a member if - (a) there is presented to the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission a petition in that behalf signed by more than one-half of the persons registered to vote in that  member’s constituency alleging their loss of confidence in that member; and  (b) the petition is thereafter, in a referendum conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission within ninety days of the date of the receipt of the petition, approved by a simple majority of the votes of the persons registered to vote in that member’s constituency.”
Another relevant provision of the constitution is Section 109. It states that, (1) A member of a House of Assembly shall vacate his seat in the House if -  (a) he becomes a member of another legislative house;  (b) any other circumstances arise that, if he were not a member of that House, would cause him to be disqualified for election as such a member; (c) he ceases to be a citizen of Nigeria; (d) he becomes President, Vice-President, Governor, Deputy Governor or a Minister of the Government of the Federation or a Commissioner of the Government of a State or a Special Adviser;  (e) save as otherwise prescribed by this Constitution, he becomes a member of a commission or other body established by this Constitution or by any other law;  (f) without just cause he is absent from meetings of the House of Assembly for a period amounting in the aggregate to more than one-third of the total number of days during which the House meets in any one year; (g) being a person whose election to the House of Assembly was sponsored by a political party, he becomes a member of another political party before the expiration of the period for which that House was elected.”
The section adds, “Provided that his membership of the latter political party is not as a result of a division in the political party of which he was previously a member or of a merger of two or more political parties or factions by one of which he was previously sponsored; or (h) the Speaker of the House of Assembly receives a certificate under the hand of the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission stating that the provisions of section 110 of this Constitution have been complied with in respect of the recall of the member. (2) The Speaker of the House of Assembly shall give effect to subsection (1) of this section, so however that the Speaker or a member shall first present evidence satisfactory to the House that any of the provisions of that subsection has become applicable in respect of the member.  (3) A member of a House of Assembly shall be deemed to be absent without just cause from a meeting of the House of Assembly unless the person presiding certifies in writing that he is satisfied that the absence of the member from the meeting was for a just cause.”

Tukur’s powers
According to some observers, some salient teasers arise given those two provisions in the 1999 Constitution. One of them is if Tukur actually could totally exercise the power and authority or influence the process for the recall of an errant lawmaker. Is there any antecedent of where a similar exercise was successfully executed in Nigeria, especially since the restoration of democracy in Nigeria in 1999? It will be recalled, for instance, that when some Alliance for Democracy (AD)] lawmakers defected to the PDP in 2003 or so, the frantic moves made by the party leaders to apply the constitutional sanction were frustrated through political meandering and legal complexities.
Some pundits have also identified the present political configuration in the National Assembly as constituting a major impediment to Tukur’s threat. In the past, the PDP had not been able to muster its majority in the National Assembly to its advantage on critical national issues. Accordingly, it is doubtful if the Tukur-led mainstream PDP could achieve such goal now that the PDP umbrella appears to be riddled with yawing holes, which other members of the National Assembly elected on the ticket of other opposition parties are likely to exploit to create further crevices in the PDP mansion.

Role of governors
Most of the aggrieved PDP legislators belong to the camp of those PDP governors that are up in arms against Tukur. From experience, the governors control the party’s machinery in their individual states as PDP leaders and would be prepared to deploy all necessary resources to frustrate any sponsored recall agenda of any lawmaker, especially from the North-East, North-Central and North-West, where most of the legislators represent in the National Assembly.
With the opposition’s strength in the National Assembly expected to be almost equal the politically dangerous two-thirds majority, will it be right to describe the ongoing crisis as the ultimate endgame for the PDP?